In a typical market environment, stock market optimism and consumer sentiment move in tandem. Consumer sentiment reflects households’ perspectives on their personal finances and the broader economy, helping gauge their willingness to spend or save. As economic conditions strengthen, households’ financial outlook and stock market expectations improve. Today, however, the divergence is the story. Consumer expectations for higher stock prices are currently at their highest level in decades, while consumer sentiment is at historically depressed levels. Rather than treating this as a simple bearish signal, the central question is what this gap reveals about the current market environment. To understand that, we must examine its historical magnitude, previous occurrences, and underlying drivers.
Looking at the scale of this divergence, it appears highly unusual. The current percentage of consumers expecting higher stock prices ranks around the 99th percentile of available history with a Z-score of 2.33, while the current level of consumer sentiment sits near the 1st percentile with a Z-score of -2.36. Standardizing the two allows us to account for different scaling and reveals that the spread between both Z-scores is 4.39 standard deviations. This current spread sits at the 99th percentile of observations dating back to 1987 and carries a Z-score of 4.15, which equates to roughly a 1-in-60,000 outcome under a normal distribution. This divergence reached all-time highs in May and remains elevated, placing the current gap among the widest observed in nearly four decades of available history.
This disconnect has also caught the attention of major financial institutions, with J.P. Morgan mentioning the “huge divergence between dismal consumer confidence and a euphoric stock market”[i] and Charles Schwab noting that current levels would typically be viewed as a “bearish signal for equities.”[ii] Such a disconnect could spark concerns for eroding household sentiment eventually translating into weaker consumer spending and corporate earnings, creating a potential headwind for broader markets. This raises a substantive question: have similar divergences provided a meaningful signal for subsequent market performance? Among the 14 episodes when the divergence reached the top 10% of its historical range, subsequent S&P 500 returns averaged 0.74%, 4.29%, 2.69%, 6.05%, and 16.44% for the following 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. However, outcomes varied based on the underlying market environment. While several episodes were followed by gains, those that occurred in 2000 and 2008 were followed by negative returns. This variation is important: the dispersion between these series has historically identified unusual market environments but not necessarily bear markets themselves. With the current divergence moving beyond previously observed ranges, history may be more useful as context rather than a clear directional signal.
Instead, current market dynamics can help explain why consumers simultaneously hold an optimistic outlook for the stock market yet remain pessimistic about their own financial situation. On the consumer side, real disposable income growth has slowed to 0.52%, down from 1.19% a year ago and well below its historical average of 3.14%. This current growth rate sits at the 9th percentile historically. Meanwhile, corporate profits and employee compensation continue to diverge toward opposite ends of their historical ranges. Corporate profits have risen from 11.44% to 12.13% of GDP over the past year, placing its current level near the upper end of its historical range, while employee compensation has fallen from 51.63% to 50.47%, at the bottom of its range. Stock market wealth is also highly concentrated, with the top 10% of households owning 87.4% of equity wealth, compared to 12.7% held by the bottom 90%.[iii] Factors supporting corporate profits and investment portfolios can therefore remain strong even as income growth weakens, while the benefits of rising equities accrue disproportionately to wealthier households.
This disconnect between consumer optimism regarding the stock market and pessimism toward their financial situation appears, at first glance, contradictory. While major financial institutions have also highlighted this disconnect and questioned its implications for broader markets, historical evidence suggests that such divergences alone have not provided a meaningful signal for subsequent returns. Rather, slowing real income growth, elevated corporate profitability, and highly concentrated equity ownership provide a plausible explanation for how the two views can coexist. With this divergence reaching unprecedented levels, the question becomes how, and through which side of the divergence, it resolves, rather than how unusual the disconnect is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i] Kelly, David. “A Baseline Forecast for 2026,” January 5, 2026. https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/market-updates/notes-on-the-week-ahead/a-baseline-forecast-for-2026/.
[ii] Liz Ann Sonders and Kevin Gordon, “2026 Mid-Year Outlook: U.S. Stocks and Economy,” Schwab Brokerage, June 3, 2026, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/us-stock-market-outlook?msockid=0dfcac4729fb60dd3beeba95283d6188.
[iii] Figures may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
Disclosures
Integrated Capital Management, Inc. is an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Registration does not imply any certain level of skill or training. This blog is intended solely to report on various investment views held by Integrated Capital Management. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute a solicitation, offer or recommendation to purchase or sell a security.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that investments in foreign markets are subject to special currency, political, and economic risks. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Where applicable, portfolio characteristics are shown gross of fees.
Any capital markets views are intended solely to report on various investment views held by Integrated Capital Management. Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute a solicitation, offer or recommendation to purchase or sell a security. Outlook may change at any time given shifting market conditions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that investments in foreign markets are subject to special currency, political, and economic risks. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
